Welcome Back Longhorns! I can’t wait to meet you for Spring 2018! This semester, I am teaching Psychology of Advertising and Integrated Communications Management.
Next semester, Fall 2018 I will be teaching Consumer Behavior (masters and doctoral level) and Integrated Communications Management (upper-class undergraduate level).
In Spring 2019, I will teach a doctoral seminar. I will teach Advanced Research Methods (doctoral level) and Campaigns (the capstone undergrad project course).
Come see me during office hours (Wed 10-11 this semester and by appointment) in the Belo Center for New Media or contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Welcome. I teach a consumer psychology course titled Psychology & Advertising. In addition to the graduate level Integrated Communication Management Courses, I also teach an undergraduate (juniors and seniors) Integrated Communication Management case course based on a managerial decision framework. Teaching, service, and research info is available in my CV.
For managers looking for data-driven consumer-based integrated branding strategies, I collaborate with some high profile experiential marketing events and their sponsors. Corporate or community partners benefit from research design grounded in theory and established measures, and our scholarly work benefits from the ability to test theory-based models with real-world data. Check out some of my past field studies for clients and marketing scholarship at Event Sponsorship Measurement.
My consumer psychology research is in contexts of event marketing, electronic marketing, or education marketing. I also put these for download on SSRN. My research stream is grounded in a deep interest in explaining and predicting linkages among consumer attitude, affect, cognition, behavioral intent, and consumer behavior. I am fascinated by this chain, which has been well developed in traditional mass communication contexts. Yet, the experiential/entertainment/live/face-to-face nature of events/sponsorship, along with the duality of event sponsorship, deserves process models that are distinct. For this reason, the context/vehicle of my work is often (sponsored) events. The theories I tend to develop or rely on as framework to explain or predict outcomes of efficacy in event sponsorship are: affect transfer theory, resistance theory, schema theory, social identity theory, image transfer theory, and congruency theory.
My consumer research tested in the experiential context of events falls into these areas:
- Testing the relationships among attitude, affect, cognition/product knowledge, behavioral intention, and consumer behaviors (in the context of sponsored events)
- Evaluating how consumers process and respond to sponsorship as a communication tool and/or channel at live events
- Isolating the role of consumers’ perception of a company as socially responsible and how that relates to the perceived sincerity or altruism of a corporate sponsor
- Understanding consumer attitudes towards a non-profit event beneficiary and how that impacts the public relations component of corporate sponsorship
- Studying issues related to maintaining customer relationships and the role of hospitality in the context of sponsored events
- Explaining how consumer engagement is what drives attitude lifts towards title sponsors
- Explaining the key role of the consumer’s activeness in the event domain (e.g., sport) on their attitudes toward the event and the affect transfer to the title sponsor
- Explaining and predicting word-of-mouth and e-word-of mouth/social media behavior for events or sponsors
- Explaining and predicting sponsorship patronage
- Building “market resistance theory”-why consumers may resist special events and the associated market rituals
- Explaining how events bring a specific consideration of affective forecasting
- Explaining how exactly fit matters- mainly why consumers’ perceived fit between an event and title sponsor is more of a concern to sponsors rather than venues
Future work will continue theory development, building upon these process models, replicating them in different event contexts, and adding new dimensions. Working papers involve the development of the cognitive aspect in sponsorship processing, such as testing how consumer visual processing and need for cognition play a distinct role in awareness of the sponsorship, attention to the brand logos close to the center of action, and ultimately sponsorship efficacy. This work in progress ties together lessons learned from researching how consumers process, understand and/or act on sponsorship messages and how events/sponsorships can be a way to engage consumers.
The importance of this research relates to a change of media vehicles from traditional media to purportedly more engaging experiential communication. With rapid growth comes the need for theoretical understanding of the whys, hows, and boundary conditions of what activates event sponsorship in communication for brands and non-profits. Sponsorship is the fastest growing element in the modern marketing mix (IEG 2013). Companies from banks to hospitals are investing more in experiential event marketing and sponsorship; a next stage is to broadly explain these process models in terms of social gravity—bringing and pulling consumers into ideas, movements, values, lifestyles via the events, sponsorships, brands, and social connection (online and offline) with other consumers. I see the social gravity element as a deeper theme to continue exploring. Thus, a working paper focuses on the community element of an event, and how the event brings members of the community together for a common purpose. Social gravity is an interest that has emerged from the community aspect of my work, and one I am passionate about.
For more information, office hours, or to schedule an appointment, please contact me.
For consumers, Angeline